<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personalităţi pentru icoane (IV)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/</link>
	<description>Împotriva discriminării majorităţii</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zlate vic</title>
		<link>http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>zlate vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Ma opun categoric acestui demers anti crestin. 
Cei ce accepta acest lucru (excluderea icoanelor folosite de ortodocsi,greco si romano catolici) sunt mai rai decat tradatorii de tara.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ma opun categoric acestui demers anti crestin.<br />
Cei ce accepta acest lucru (excluderea icoanelor folosite de ortodocsi,greco si romano catolici) sunt mai rai decat tradatorii de tara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnus Castus</title>
		<link>http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnus Castus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvati-icoanele.info/2006/12/07/personalitati-pentru-icoane-iv/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>It is not unexpected, even if it is regrettable the Orthodox Christians to be confronted like that by an atheist minded organisation. Principally we, too, underestimate how much post-communists societies have been influenced by the communist mentality which, even when relinquished, governs the minds of people through humanism. For what else is humanism if not a refined form of atheism, in its elaborated stratagems for opposing and destroying Christianity? If placing an Icon in public place is &quot;Discrimination&quot;, then what is pornography? These people should be fighting against the Advertisements as well, because they are the starkest encroachment onto our private lives, are they not? The carnality of their minds, however, prevents them from seeing that they are ridiculously irrelevant and incoherent in their opposition to placing Icons in public sites. If they would be truthful and relevant in themselves, then they should launch a campaign against ALL public images, and even ALL public symbols of ANY ideology, including their own. And a good advocate should be able to demonstrate this irrelevence and ludicrousness of theirs in a vivid and cogent portrayal in court!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not unexpected, even if it is regrettable the Orthodox Christians to be confronted like that by an atheist minded organisation. Principally we, too, underestimate how much post-communists societies have been influenced by the communist mentality which, even when relinquished, governs the minds of people through humanism. For what else is humanism if not a refined form of atheism, in its elaborated stratagems for opposing and destroying Christianity? If placing an Icon in public place is &#8220;Discrimination&#8221;, then what is pornography? These people should be fighting against the Advertisements as well, because they are the starkest encroachment onto our private lives, are they not? The carnality of their minds, however, prevents them from seeing that they are ridiculously irrelevant and incoherent in their opposition to placing Icons in public sites. If they would be truthful and relevant in themselves, then they should launch a campaign against ALL public images, and even ALL public symbols of ANY ideology, including their own. And a good advocate should be able to demonstrate this irrelevence and ludicrousness of theirs in a vivid and cogent portrayal in court!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

